南非专家：国际社会应对美国打击委内瑞拉做出实质性集体回应

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the recent U.S. military action against Venezuela is a violation of the country's sovereignty and represents direct resource plundering, setting a dangerous precedent for international relations [1]. Group 1: U.S. Military Action - The motivations behind the U.S. strike are largely unrelated to democracy, human rights, or drug control, with President Trump openly admitting the intention to take over Venezuela's oil reserves [1]. - This action is characterized as direct resource plundering, reminiscent of colonial practices, utilizing military force to seize resources that cannot be obtained through economic pressure or political manipulation [1]. - The military action was conducted without authorization from the United Nations Security Council or approval from the U.S. Congress, fundamentally violating principles of international law [1]. Group 2: Long-term Implications - The U.S. infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty is seen as the culmination of a long-term regime change strategy, where imperialist forces resort to overt violence when indirect methods fail [1]. - The threats posed to Colombia, Mexico, and other nations indicate a bullying strategy by the U.S. against any country perceived as an obstacle to its unilateral resource acquisition and market access [1]. Group 3: Call for International Response - The article emphasizes the need for a substantial collective response from the international community, moving beyond mere verbal support to establishing integrated defense arrangements and alternative financial and trade systems to resist unilateral coercion [2]. - Peace-loving nations must form unbreakable alliances to counteract such rampant aggression, or they risk being forced to fight alone [2].