Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the widespread opposition from European citizens and scholars regarding U.S. President Trump's threats to acquire Greenland, emphasizing the importance of respecting international law and national sovereignty [1][3][6]. Group 1: Public Sentiment in Brussels - Residents in Brussels express that the notion of the U.S. claiming another territory is unacceptable, warning of severe consequences if such actions are normalized [1]. - There is a strong belief that international law and national borders must be respected, highlighting a lack of mutual respect in current international relations [3]. - Concerns are raised about the potential for NATO member states to become divided, undermining shared values and security partnerships [5]. Group 2: Public Sentiment in Poland - Polish citizens and scholars voice their worries about U.S. statements, asserting that international law and order should be upheld [7]. - There is a sentiment that any attempt to control Greenland would be seen as interference and an attempt to occupy land that does not belong to the U.S. [9]. - The motivations behind U.S. interest in Greenland are questioned, with some suggesting it is driven by the desire for mineral resources rather than genuine geopolitical concerns [11]. Group 3: Academic Perspectives - Academics in Poland argue that U.S. rhetoric regarding Greenland undermines global order and questions the principles established post-World War II [12]. - European leaders, including those from NATO, have publicly supported Denmark and Greenland's right to self-determination, opposing U.S. interference in Danish internal affairs [12]. - The dependency of Europe on U.S. military and technological support is highlighted, suggesting that the Greenland issue may prompt a reevaluation of this reliance [14].
欧洲民众反对美国威胁得到格陵兰岛
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-10 09:09