张思南：对于台湾，特朗普说了实话，但出发点不对

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the distinction between the situations in Venezuela and Taiwan, arguing that comparing them is misleading due to their differing international legal statuses and the nature of the issues involved [2][3] - The article asserts that China's decision-making regarding Taiwan is based on its comprehensive strength, strategic goals, and risk assessment, rather than being driven by external pressures or emotional responses [2][3] - It highlights that the pursuit of a decisive approach is aimed at preventing the Taiwan Strait from descending into chaos and war, embodying the logic of "using war to stop war" [4] Group 2 - Trump's recent comments suggest a transactional approach to international relations, indicating that the U.S. may not be willing to bear additional strategic costs or risks regarding Taiwan, reflecting a shift away from maintaining an abstract international order [6][7] - The article notes that Trump's stance does not equate to support for either side but rather redefines the U.S. position in the Taiwan issue as one of non-intervention, which could help reduce miscalculations by pro-independence forces [7] - It emphasizes that while China welcomes a reduction in U.S. intervention in Taiwan, it does not accept a new order that disregards international law and norms, advocating for a world with established boundaries and basic regulations [7]