一周军评：几样“高科技”武器吓不住帝国主义，怎么办？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent U.S. military operation to capture Venezuelan President Maduro, highlighting the disparity between the myths created by U.S. military contractors and the actual effectiveness of their technologies in the operation [1][2]. Group 1: Military Technology and Market Reactions - Companies like Palantir and Anduril have been touted for their AI software and drone technologies allegedly used in the operation, leading to a significant rise in Palantir's stock price over three consecutive trading days [4][5]. - The claims regarding the effectiveness of Palantir's AI in locating Venezuelan defense systems are exaggerated, as the actual military operation revealed that the software did not play a decisive role [5][6]. - The military's technological superiority and the poor state of Venezuelan military readiness were the primary factors in the operation's success, rather than the advanced technologies being marketed [6][9]. Group 2: Venezuelan Military Condition - Reports indicate that 50% of Venezuela's air defense radar systems were non-operational due to a lack of spare parts, and the air force's operational capabilities were severely limited [7][11]. - The Venezuelan military's reliance on outdated technology and insufficient funding has left it vulnerable, with many advanced weapons purchased in the past now rendered ineffective [12][14]. - The military's strategic approach has focused on acquiring high-tech weapons to deter U.S. intervention, but this has not translated into effective defense capabilities [12][13]. Group 3: Recommendations for Military Strategy - Countries facing similar threats should consider adopting a "porcupine" strategy, enhancing their defensive capabilities with a mix of conventional and advanced systems rather than relying solely on high-tech solutions [14][22]. - The article suggests that nations should invest in affordable and effective defense technologies, such as passive radar systems and low-cost air defense solutions, to improve their military readiness [17][20]. - Emphasizing the importance of military preparedness, the article argues that without a proactive defense strategy, nations risk becoming targets for military operations [11][26].