管理三重奏|福建安溪：开展案件质量随机评查活动

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of meticulous case quality evaluation in the judicial process, highlighting a random review initiative by the Anxi County Procuratorate to enhance legal document accuracy and procedural compliance [1][2]. Group 1: Case Quality Evaluation Initiative - Anxi County Procuratorate initiated a random case quality evaluation activity, reviewing 106 out of over 1500 concluded cases, representing at least 6% of the annual case volume handled by each prosecutor [1][2]. - The evaluation focuses on over ten aspects, including substantive fairness, procedural compliance, case effectiveness, and the implementation of judicial responsibility [1]. Group 2: Identified Issues and Improvement Measures - The evaluation aims to identify common issues in case handling, such as vague legal terminology, improper citation of legal articles, and non-standard documentation practices, which, while not affecting overall quality, are still significant [2]. - The Procuratorate plans to implement corrective and preventive measures based on the identified issues, fostering a rigorous and standardized case handling approach [2]. Group 3: Performance and Learning - In 2025, the Procuratorate handled 69 public interest litigation cases, achieving optimal results with minimal judicial costs, with one case recognized as a typical example by the Supreme People's Procuratorate [2]. - The department is committed to continuous improvement through cross-evaluations of completed cases, sharing insights in business salons, and learning from exemplary cases to enhance case handling quality [2].