美国的霸权行径是对国际法的严峻挑战

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the illegality of the U.S. actions against Venezuelan President Maduro under international law, with experts asserting that such actions represent a severe challenge to international legal norms [1][2][5] - The U.S. justification for the "capture" of Maduro is based on not recognizing him as the legitimate president of Venezuela, which experts argue violates his sovereign immunity as a head of state [2][3] - The actions taken by the U.S. are seen as a dangerous precedent for military interventions and resource appropriation, indicating a shift towards a more aggressive and unilateral approach in international relations [3][4] Group 2 - The concept of "Monroe Doctrine" has evolved into what is termed "Trump Doctrine," emphasizing U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere and the right to intervene in Latin America to prevent foreign influence [4] - Experts warn that the U.S. actions could lead to the weaponization and fragmentation of international law, creating a scenario where legal principles are selectively applied to serve specific national interests [4][5] - The implications of these actions could severely undermine trust and cooperation within the international community, signaling a willingness to bypass international law for national gain [5]