Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the legal implications of knowingly purchasing counterfeit goods for the purpose of seeking compensation, emphasizing that such actions are not encouraged by the law [1][2][3]. Group 1: Case Summary - A consumer, Wang Hao, purchased four bottles of wine for a total of 2960 yuan, later claiming they were counterfeit and seeking tenfold compensation from the seller, Hu Guang [1]. - The court confirmed that a sales contract existed between the parties, as Wang paid for the products and received them, thus supporting his request for a refund of 2960 yuan [1]. - The court ruled that Wang's actions indicated a deliberate intent to profit from the situation, as he recorded the purchase and made multiple large purchases without consuming the products [2]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The court determined that Wang's behavior constituted "knowing purchase of counterfeit goods," which disqualified him from receiving punitive damages beyond three times his losses, resulting in a compensation of 8880 yuan [2]. - The ruling reflects a broader legal stance against opportunistic claims by consumers who exploit the system for financial gain, urging a balance between consumer rights and ethical conduct [3]. - The court encourages consumers to pursue legitimate avenues for addressing counterfeit goods while maintaining integrity and not abusing their rights [3].
“知假买假”全程录像,只为索求十倍赔偿!法院判了
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-11 15:10