委内瑞拉之后是格陵兰 欧洲是否再次为美国“让步”？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. government's longstanding interest in Greenland, particularly in light of recent military actions in Venezuela and social media activity by key political figures, highlighting the geopolitical implications and resource interests associated with Greenland [1][3][14]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and Statements - On January 3, a U.S. military operation targeted Venezuela, coinciding with a social media post by Katie Miller, wife of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, suggesting U.S. ambitions regarding Greenland [1][3]. - U.S. Vice President Pence indicated that Secretary of State Rubio would meet with Danish and Greenlandic officials, while President Trump asserted that the U.S. would take action regarding Greenland, regardless of local consent [7][9]. Group 2: European Response - European nations, including Denmark, expressed strong opposition to U.S. claims over Greenland, emphasizing that decisions regarding Greenland should be made by Denmark and the Greenlandic people [5][4]. - Analysts noted that European countries' reluctance to openly criticize U.S. actions in Venezuela reflects a broader concern about maintaining transatlantic relations, despite the apparent double standards in international affairs [7]. Group 3: Historical Context and Strategic Interests - The U.S. has a historical interest in acquiring Greenland, dating back to attempts in the 19th and mid-20th centuries, with strategic motivations tied to national security and geopolitical positioning [9][11]. - Greenland is viewed as strategically significant due to its resources, including rare earth elements and potential oil reserves, which are increasingly important as climate change opens new shipping routes in the Arctic [14][12].