当“军事侵略”被包装成“执法行动”：揭穿美国十大虚伪话术

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent U.S. military action against Venezuela, highlighting the capture of President Maduro and the implications of this event on international relations and U.S. foreign policy [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. launched airstrikes against multiple military targets in Venezuela, including La Guaira Port and several air force bases, marking a significant escalation in military threats since August 2025 [1][3]. - The operation involved the use of special forces and was described by U.S. officials as a law enforcement action rather than an act of war, which has sparked political debate regarding the legality of the action [4][6]. Group 2: International Reactions and Implications - The military action has been widely condemned by the international community as a violation of international law and the sovereignty of Venezuela, with accusations of U.S. imperialism and terrorism [3][4]. - The U.S. government's narrative attempts to shift focus from the invasion to issues surrounding Maduro's legitimacy and alleged drug-related crimes, thereby diverting attention from the act of aggression itself [5][6]. Group 3: Media and Narrative Control - The article emphasizes the U.S. strategy of using narrative manipulation to frame the military action in a favorable light, including portraying it as a necessary law enforcement measure [5][6]. - There is a concern that the focus on individual figures like Maduro oversimplifies the broader geopolitical implications and the historical context of U.S. interventions in Latin America [7][8]. Group 4: Economic Interests - The article suggests that U.S. foreign policy, particularly in Venezuela, is heavily influenced by oil interests, which remain central to its diplomatic strategies [8][9].