一财社论：营造公平有序的竞争环境

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for effective enforcement against unfair competition and monopolistic practices in the food delivery platform sector, highlighting the importance of both good laws and governance to ensure fair market competition and protect consumer rights [1][4]. Group 1: Current Market Conditions - The State Council's Anti-Monopoly and Anti-Unfair Competition Committee has announced an investigation into the competitive status of the food delivery service industry due to issues like excessive subsidies, price wars, and traffic control, which are harming the real economy and intensifying "involution" competition [1][2]. - There is a strong public response to the unfair competition practices in the food delivery sector, prompting calls for regulatory action to restore fair competition [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Expectations - The market expects the State Council's investigation to address the current chaotic competition landscape and establish a fair competitive order [2]. - There are concerns that regulatory actions might overreach and interfere with normal business decisions, highlighting the need for clear communication and minimizing misunderstandings during enforcement [2][3]. Group 3: Enforcement Principles - Administrative enforcement should focus on regulating rights violations without infringing on the legitimate rights of other market participants, maintaining a balance between protecting market transactions and avoiding excessive intervention [3]. - Transparency in administrative enforcement processes is crucial, with a need for quantifiable steps to enhance accountability and prevent corruption [3]. Group 4: Future Directions - The investigation into the food delivery industry is seen as a careful, data-driven approach to identify competitive issues and inform future policy and enforcement actions, reflecting a commitment to scientific regulation and precise governance [4]. - Strengthening market autonomy and consumer rights is essential, with suggestions to introduce collective litigation and other mechanisms to empower consumers in defending their rights at lower costs [3][4].