这个“梦中情岛” 他眼馋很久了

Core Viewpoint - President Trump has reiterated the U.S. intention to acquire Greenland, emphasizing the need for ownership rather than mere military presence, which has sparked discontent among NATO allies and led to discussions among European nations about military deployment in Greenland [2][5][7]. Group 1: U.S. Position on Greenland - Trump stated that the U.S. must "own" Greenland for national security reasons, dismissing the idea of merely leasing or having military bases there [2][8]. - He expressed skepticism about NATO's support for the U.S. in critical times, claiming that the alliance is more dependent on the U.S. than vice versa [2][7]. - Trump's comments have been characterized as a significant escalation in U.S. foreign policy regarding Greenland, which he views as a strategic asset [8][9]. Group 2: European Response - European nations, led by the UK and Germany, are discussing the deployment of NATO forces to Greenland in response to Trump's aggressive stance [4][5]. - Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen indicated that the situation regarding Greenland is at a "decisive moment," suggesting potential ramifications for NATO if the U.S. pursues aggressive actions [2][6]. - A joint statement from several European countries emphasized that Greenland belongs to its people and that only Denmark and Greenland can decide their own affairs [7]. Group 3: Strategic Importance of Greenland - Greenland is strategically located and rich in key minerals and fossil fuels, making it a focal point for global powers amid climate change, which is making these resources more accessible [9]. - The island's potential for rare earth resources has seen a surge in interest, particularly from U.S. leadership, which could impact market dynamics for companies involved in these sectors [9]. Group 4: Potential U.S. Strategies for Acquisition - Analysts suggest four potential methods the U.S. might consider to acquire Greenland: purchasing it, inciting independence, binding treaties, or military action [11][12][16][17]. - The idea of purchasing Greenland has faced strong opposition from both the Danish government and the local population, raising legal and ethical concerns [12][15]. - Military action, while considered an option, could lead to severe political repercussions and jeopardize NATO's unity, as highlighted by the Danish Prime Minister [17].