IPO承销保荐费格局生变

Core Insights - The IPO market is experiencing significant changes in underwriting and advisory fee structures due to new regulations and market conditions, with a notable shift from the previously dominant tiered fee model to a mixed fee model that includes fixed rates and minimum or maximum fee clauses [4][5] Fee Structures - The tiered fee model, which was prevalent in 2023 with 38% of cases, has drastically decreased to 6% by 2025, with most remaining cases adopting a decreasing fee percentage [3][4] - The traditional model of "actual fundraising amount × fixed rate" is now used by 33% of IPOs in 2025, with underwriting fees typically ranging from 5% to 9% [4] - A new model combining fixed rates with limit conditions has gained traction, with 49% of IPOs in 2025 utilizing this approach, up from 25% in 2023, primarily due to changing fundraising expectations [5] - The "one-price" fee model has been adopted by 12% of IPOs in 2025, focusing on direct pricing for online offerings [5] Market Trends - The average underwriting fee for the Sci-Tech Innovation Board reached 1.22 billion yuan in 2025, a significant increase from the previous average of 957.98 million yuan [7] - Conversely, the average underwriting fees for the main board and the ChiNext board have decreased, with the main board averaging 65.31 million yuan and the ChiNext board at 46.58 million yuan, reflecting a decline of over 30% for the ChiNext board compared to previous years [7][8] - The Beijing Stock Exchange has seen a notable increase in IPO fees, with an average of 20.80 million yuan in 2025, up 43% from the previous average of 14.56 million yuan [8] Market Concentration - The IPO underwriting market continues to exhibit a "head effect," with a small number of securities firms capturing the majority of market share, as only 13 firms generated over 100 million yuan in IPO revenue in the past year [9] - CITIC Securities leads the market with nearly 1.1 billion yuan in underwriting fees, followed by CITIC Construction Investment and Guotai Junan, indicating a concentration of high-quality projects among top firms [9]