资本利益论——数字经济时代的“三重五维”整合分析

Core Perspective - The article discusses the challenges faced by traditional political economy theories in the digital age, emphasizing the need for a new theoretical framework called "Triple-Five Dimensional" to analyze the contradictions of digital capital and its implications for governance in China [1][8]. Group 1: Theoretical Foundations - Capital is defined as a dynamic social relationship rather than a mere object, with its essence captured in three characteristics: relational nature, movement quality, and the essence of interests [2]. - In the digital age, the nature of capital has shifted from physical assets to data, algorithms, and computing power, leading to new control relationships between platforms, algorithms, and users [2]. - The acceleration of capital movement, facilitated by technologies like blockchain and AI, has compressed the time and space of capital circulation, resulting in risks such as the over-expansion of the virtual economy [2]. Group 2: Essence of Interests - The ultimate goal of capital movement is to achieve value growth, with the formula for surplus value evolving to include data as a key factor, highlighting the growing importance of data in the distribution of interests [3]. - The monopolistic position of platform capital leads to significant imbalances in interest distribution, exacerbating social inequality [3]. Group 3: Analytical Dimensions - The article introduces a five-dimensional model to analyze interests in the digital age, focusing on subjectivity, objectivity, process, temporality, and spatiality [4]. - The subjectivity dimension reflects the conflict between users' digital identities and their biological selves, while objectivity expands to include new asset forms like data and NFTs [4]. - The process of interest realization has transformed from linear to automated and programmable distributions, influenced by blockchain technology [4]. Group 4: Integration Framework - The "Triple-Five Dimensional" framework is an organic system that illustrates the dialectical interconstruction of relationships, movements, and interests in the digital economy [5][6]. - The monopolistic production relationships of digital platforms dictate the acceleration of capital movement and the skewed distribution of benefits towards capital [5]. - The pursuit of maximizing data value drives platforms to reinforce data monopolies and optimize algorithm efficiency [6]. Group 5: Value of the Framework - The framework reveals inherent contradictions in the digital economy, such as the coexistence of technological empowerment and labor alienation, and the tension between efficiency and fairness [7]. - It provides a comprehensive analytical tool for evaluating governance practices, particularly in the context of China's governance model, which seeks to balance efficiency, fairness, innovation, and security [7]. - Ultimately, the framework aims to establish a model for orderly capital expansion that prioritizes social equity, ecological sustainability, and data security, contributing to a new path towards digital civilization [7].