Core Viewpoint - The recent U.S. military actions against Venezuela reflect an escalation of its "Tangerine Doctrine," threatening the sovereignty of Latin American countries and undermining the post-war international order [1]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. has conducted military strikes against Venezuela and forcibly controlled President Maduro and his wife [1]. - This military intervention signifies a shift from the "Monroe Doctrine" to the "Tangerine Doctrine," combining judicial intervention with military interference [1]. Group 2: Implications for Sovereignty - The U.S. actions are seen as an upgrade of its "long-arm jurisdiction," which poses a serious threat to the sovereignty and security of affected nations [1]. - Such actions violate international law and the fundamental principles of international relations, breaching the purposes and principles of the United Nations Charter [1]. Group 3: Regional Response - Following the U.S. military actions, the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) held a special summit demanding the unconditional release of Maduro and his wife, as well as the withdrawal of foreign military forces from the Caribbean [1]. - This response indicates a strengthening of strategic autonomy among Latin American countries to resist U.S. hegemonic interference through multilateral diplomacy [1].
专家:“唐罗主义”是美国滥施“长臂管辖”的升级
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-13 11:31