Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-14 13:16Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the use of technology, particularly big data and artificial intelligence, in enhancing anti-corruption efforts within China's disciplinary inspection and supervision system, highlighting the case of Li Yong, a former executive at China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC), as a significant example of cross-border corruption [1][56]. Group 1: Technology in Anti-Corruption - The disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies are accelerating the construction of a digital system to enhance anti-corruption efforts using big data and AI [1][56]. - Recent efforts have focused on addressing cross-border corruption, which has become a challenge for authorities as corrupt individuals attempt to evade investigation by moving illicit funds abroad [1][56]. - The application of technology has significantly improved the efficiency and effectiveness of supervision and law enforcement in combating corruption [1][56]. Group 2: Li Yong's Case - Li Yong, former Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee and General Manager of CNOOC, is under investigation for serious corruption issues, particularly in overseas projects [5][60]. - Over 83% of the illicit funds in Li Yong's case originated from abroad, with investigations spanning 10 countries and regions [7][62]. - Li Yong's long tenure in the oil sector allowed him to disguise corrupt practices within seemingly legitimate project collaborations, making it difficult to trace the evidence of his wrongdoing [9][64]. Group 3: Investigation Techniques - The investigation into Li Yong was initiated based on various clues and suspicions regarding his involvement in corruption, leading to a data-driven approach for evidence gathering [11][66]. - The use of big data platforms allowed investigators to analyze Li Yong's business relationships and identify key individuals involved in corrupt activities [14][69]. - A businessman named Ren Fengde, who had close ties with Li Yong, was found to have received suspicious contracts, indicating a network of corruption [14][69]. Group 4: Corruption Mechanisms - Li Yong utilized his position to facilitate corrupt transactions, often using intermediaries to obscure the flow of illicit funds [23][78]. - He arranged for offshore accounts to hide the proceeds of corruption, complicating the tracing of these funds [31][86]. - The investigation successfully utilized international cooperation to gather evidence, demonstrating the effectiveness of cross-border legal collaboration in anti-corruption efforts [33][88]. Group 5: Consequences and Sentencing - Following the investigation, Li Yong was detained and later sentenced to 14 years in prison for bribery, along with a fine of 3 million RMB [53][108]. - The case serves as a cautionary tale about the consequences of corruption, highlighting the irreversible damage to personal and professional reputations [55][110].