老物业赖着不走 业主可拒付物业费

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal issues surrounding the transition of property management companies in residential communities, highlighting the challenges faced by residents when the original property management refuses to vacate and continues to demand fees after the contract has expired [3][4]. Group 1: Legal Framework - The "Civil Code of the People's Republic of China" clearly defines the responsibilities and boundaries of property management companies, stating that upon contract termination, the original company must vacate the premises within a reasonable timeframe and hand over relevant materials to the new management [4]. - If the original property management fails to comply, they cannot demand payment for services rendered after the contract termination and may be liable for damages incurred by the homeowners [4]. Group 2: Resident Challenges - Residents are facing difficulties when the original property management company does not leave after the contract ends, leading to issues such as delayed garbage collection and maintenance of public facilities [3]. - Homeowners are concerned about paying fees to the original management, fearing that doing so may result in financial loss if the company does not vacate [3]. Group 3: Legal Actions and Recommendations - It is recommended that the homeowners' committee send a formal notice to the original property management specifying the vacate date and handover details, and if they do not comply, homeowners can refuse to pay fees and pursue legal action [4]. - The original property management's claim that the decision to hire a new company is invalid due to voting irregularities is legally unfounded, as they do not have the standing to challenge the homeowners' committee's decisions [5].