Zhong Guo Jin Rong Xin Xi Wang·2026-01-16 09:27Core Viewpoint - A lawsuit involving the quality of battery cells supplied by Xinwanda Power to Geely's subsidiary, Weirui Electric, has raised concerns about the long-standing issue of defining quality responsibility within the electric vehicle supply chain [1][2]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - Xinwanda announced that it is being sued for 2.314 billion yuan due to alleged quality issues with battery cells delivered between June 2021 and December 2023 [2]. - Weirui Electric, a subsidiary of Geely, is involved in the lawsuit and is a key player in the high-end electric vehicle market [2]. - The lawsuit highlights the complexity of battery safety, which cannot be solely attributed to the battery cells, as it involves multiple components and systems [3]. Group 2: Quality Responsibility - The safety of power batteries is recognized as a complex system that includes battery pack design, battery management systems, and vehicle integration [3]. - Xinwanda asserts that similar battery cells supplied to other clients have not experienced quality issues, suggesting that the problem may not lie solely with the battery cells [3]. - The industry is urged to avoid one-sided blame and to analyze the complexities of automotive batteries to foster healthy development [3]. Group 3: Supply Chain and Responsibility - The recall of Volvo's EX30 vehicles, which reportedly used battery cells from Xinwanda, has further complicated the situation, with Xinwanda clarifying that it is not directly involved in the battery system sold to Volvo [4]. - The incidents are seen as critical examples for examining quality, responsibility, and risk within the electric vehicle supply chain, impacting corporate survival and industry ecology [4]. - There is a call for establishing a fair responsibility-sharing mechanism within the supply chain to enhance resilience and competitiveness in the global market [4][5].