SIVR vs. PPLT: Riding Silver and Platinum's Explosive 2025 Rally

Core Viewpoint - The comparison between the Abrdn Physical Silver Shares ETF (SIVR) and the Abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) highlights differences in cost, asset management, risk profiles, and returns for investors considering silver versus platinum investments [1][2]. Cost and Size Comparison - SIVR has a lower expense ratio of 0.30% compared to PPLT's 0.60%, making it more appealing for long-term investors focused on minimizing fees [4][11]. - As of January 9, 2026, SIVR has a total asset under management (AUM) of $5.43 billion, significantly larger than PPLT's $2.86 billion [3][11]. Performance and Risk Metrics - Over the past year, SIVR has returned 162.9%, outperforming PPLT's 135.6% return [3]. - The maximum drawdown over the past five years for SIVR is -38.61%, while PPLT's is -35.73%, indicating that SIVR has experienced slightly higher volatility [6]. Fund Structure and Holdings - Both SIVR and PPLT are physically backed ETFs, meaning they hold the actual metals (silver and platinum) in secure vaults, providing direct commodity exposure without the complexities of storage and insurance [10][12]. - PPLT is a single-asset ETF focused solely on platinum, while SIVR tracks the price of silver, with both funds lacking sector exposure or notable top holdings [7][8]. Market Dynamics and Demand - Silver benefits from dual demand as both an investment asset and an industrial metal, particularly in solar panels and electronics, contributing to its higher returns [10]. - Platinum's price movements are influenced by supply constraints and automotive demand, making it a more volatile investment option [12].