BTDR DEADLINE NOTICE: ROSEN, SKILLED INVESTOR COUNSEL, Encourages Bitdeer Technologies Group Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K to Secure Counsel Before Important Deadline in Securities Class Action - BTDR
BITDEERBITDEER(US:BTDR) TMX Newsfile·2026-01-18 03:39

Core Viewpoint - Rosen Law Firm is reminding investors who purchased Bitdeer Technologies Group securities between June 6, 2024, and November 10, 2025, of the upcoming lead plaintiff deadline on February 2, 2026 [1] Group 1: Class Action Details - Investors who bought Bitdeer securities during the specified Class Period may be eligible for compensation without any out-of-pocket fees through a contingency fee arrangement [2] - A class action lawsuit has already been filed, and interested parties can join by contacting Rosen Law Firm [3][6] - To serve as lead plaintiff, individuals must file with the Court by February 2, 2026, acting on behalf of other class members [3] Group 2: Rosen Law Firm's Credentials - Rosen Law Firm emphasizes the importance of selecting qualified legal counsel with a successful track record in securities class actions [4] - The firm has achieved significant settlements, including the largest securities class action settlement against a Chinese company, and has consistently ranked highly in securities class action settlements since 2013 [4] - In 2019, the firm secured over $438 million for investors, showcasing its capability in recovering funds for clients [4] Group 3: Case Specifics - The lawsuit alleges that Bitdeer provided misleading information regarding its SEALMINER Bitcoin mining machine, particularly concerning the energy efficiency of its SEAL04 chip technology [5] - Defendants are accused of failing to disclose that the SEAL04 chip, expected to have an energy efficiency of 5 J/TH, would not be ready for mass production until the second quarter of 2025, leading to artificially inflated security prices [5] - The revelation of the true state of the SEALMINER A4 project resulted in investor losses, as the misleading statements had previously encouraged purchases at inflated prices [5]