美国联邦政府与州政府均“调兵遣将”，明尼苏达州对峙再升级

Core Viewpoint - Protests in Minneapolis are escalating following the shooting of civilian Renee Good by ICE agents, highlighting issues of excessive law enforcement and the involvement of federal and state authorities in managing the situation [1][3]. Group 1: Government Response - Minnesota National Guard troops were deployed to assist local law enforcement and emergency management, focusing on traffic control and protecting citizens' rights to peaceful assembly [3]. - Approximately 1,500 soldiers from the U.S. Army's 11th Airborne Division are on standby to be sent to Minnesota if necessary, indicating a significant federal response to the unrest [3]. - President Trump mentioned the potential use of the Insurrection Act, a law that allows federal control over state National Guard forces during civil unrest, although he later stated that it was not the right time to implement it [3]. Group 2: Protests and Incidents - Protests occurred in Minneapolis, including one at an ICE temporary command center, where demonstrators faced off against law enforcement in extreme cold, resulting in multiple arrests [4]. - Over 2,400 arrests have been made in Minnesota as part of ICE's large-scale immigration enforcement actions, with reports of violence affecting innocent civilians, including a six-month-old baby [4]. - A federal judge issued an order prohibiting the use of pepper spray and tear gas by law enforcement during these operations unless justified, reflecting growing concerns over the tactics used by ICE [4]. Group 3: Public and Political Reactions - The actions of ICE have sparked outrage in the U.S., with criticism directed at the agency's perceived lack of accountability and aggressive tactics under the Trump administration [5]. - Minnesota's governor and Minneapolis' mayor are under investigation for allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement, raising questions about the balance of power between state and federal authorities [5]. - The governor criticized the federal government's approach, suggesting that using the judicial system as a weapon against political opponents is a dangerous tactic [5].