化妆品“唯成分论”乱象 检测屡陷“罗生门”

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing disputes regarding cosmetic ingredient content highlight the complexities of ingredient testing and the challenges consumers face in discerning accurate information [1][2][3] Group 1: Disputes and Testing Challenges - Different testing institutions yield varying results for the same cosmetic ingredient, leading to consumer confusion and mistrust [2][4] - The complexity of cosmetic formulations, which often contain numerous ingredients, complicates the accuracy of testing results [4][5] - The lack of standardized testing methods contributes to discrepancies in results, as different institutions may use varying techniques and protocols [4][5][6] Group 2: Consumer Guidance and Industry Practices - Consumers are advised to prioritize testing institutions with recognized qualifications, such as CMA and CNAS, and to be cautious of unqualified third-party tests [7] - The impact of ingredient content variations can be significant, especially for active ingredients present in low concentrations, where small differences can affect efficacy [8][9] - The rise of ingredient-focused consumers has prompted brands to disclose more product information, making testing results a critical factor in product valuation [9][10] Group 3: Industry Development and Recommendations - The cosmetic industry is encouraged to adopt a foundation based on skin science and evidence-based practices to address the ongoing disputes and improve consumer communication [11][12][13] - Establishing a unified standard for ingredient testing that incorporates evidence-based data and involves diverse stakeholders is essential for enhancing credibility [12][13] - The industry must shift focus from mere ingredient content to the actual effects of ingredients on skin, ensuring that product efficacy and safety are prioritized [13]