香港司法界向制裁威胁亮剑！

Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong judiciary, represented by Chief Justice Andrew Cheung and Secretary for Justice Paul Lam, strongly defends judicial independence against external pressures and sanctions related to national security cases, emphasizing that such actions undermine the rule of law [1][2][4]. Group 1: Judicial Independence - Chief Justice Andrew Cheung equates threats against judges with corruption, stating that both are methods that undermine justice and are unacceptable in a civilized legal society [2]. - Secretary for Justice Paul Lam criticizes the notion that the government always wins national security cases, providing examples of cases where the government lost, thereby reinforcing the independence of the judiciary [6][7]. Group 2: Response to External Criticism - Both Cheung and Lam address the external narrative that questions the integrity of Hong Kong's judicial system, asserting that the judiciary operates based on law and evidence, not political considerations [9]. - Cheung emphasizes the importance of respecting the Basic Law and the decisions of the Court of Final Appeal, countering misinterpretations of Hong Kong's constitutional framework [9]. Group 3: Social Responsibility of the Judiciary - Cheung expresses deep sorrow over the tragic fire incident in Tai Po, highlighting the judiciary's role not only as a legal guardian but also as a source of support for the community during times of crisis [11].