围绕格陵兰岛问题，欧洲“旅行式派兵”和“观望式反制”的背后

Core Viewpoint - The military exercise "Arctic Endurance" conducted by seven European countries in response to the U.S. government's threats regarding Greenland highlights Europe's reliance on the U.S. and its inability to assert strategic autonomy [1][4][6]. Group 1: Military Response - A military exercise involving 37 soldiers from seven European nations was conducted in Greenland to counter perceived U.S. aggression [1]. - The exercise was criticized by Italy's Defense Minister as merely a "trip," indicating a lack of serious military commitment [1][2]. - Germany's rapid withdrawal of troops after just 44 hours on the island exemplifies the superficial nature of Europe's military response [2]. Group 2: Trade Countermeasures - The EU is considering trade countermeasures, including the activation of a "trade rocket launcher" tool to freeze market access for certain U.S. entities and potentially impose tariffs on $93 billion worth of U.S. goods [2][3]. - A decision on these countermeasures is postponed until February 1, pending the U.S.'s actions regarding tariffs [3]. Group 3: Strategic Autonomy - Europe's response to the Greenland issue has exposed the limitations of its proclaimed "strategic autonomy," as it struggles to maintain unity and effectively respond to U.S. pressures [6]. - The reliance on U.S. military support is evident, with arms sales to European allies projected to rise significantly from $11 billion in 2017-2021 to $68 billion by 2024 [6]. - European nations are hesitant to take actions that might escalate tensions with the U.S., reflecting a self-restraint driven by security dependence [6].