Group 1 - The core argument presented is that Japan is unqualified to assume responsibilities for maintaining international peace and security, and thus lacks the credibility to seek a permanent seat on the UN Security Council [1][2] - The UN Security Council is described as the core of the international collective security mechanism, with a special mission to uphold the post-war international order and safeguard international peace and security [1] - Historical context is provided, highlighting the Far East International Military Tribunal and the Tokyo Trials, which served to punish Japanese war criminals and uphold international justice, warning against the resurgence of militarism [1] Group 2 - Japan's right-wing forces are accused of beautifying its invasion history and denying historical atrocities, such as the Nanjing Massacre and the forced recruitment of "comfort women" [1][2] - The statement emphasizes that a country that does not repent for historical crimes and challenges the outcomes of World War II cannot be trusted to maintain international peace and security [2] - China expresses its willingness to work with all peace-loving nations to defend the outcomes of World War II and the post-war international order, while supporting necessary reforms to enhance the representation and voice of developing countries in the Security Council [2]
中方重申:日本根本没有资格要求“入常”
Xin Hua She·2026-01-21 23:05