被指“双标” 沃尔沃EX30因电池隐患全球召回：中国除外

Core Viewpoint - Volvo is facing criticism over battery safety issues related to its EX30 model, which uses batteries from the supplier, CATL. The company has initiated recalls in several countries but has not yet addressed the concerns of Chinese customers, leading to allegations of differential treatment [1][3][4]. Group 1: Recall Information - Volvo has launched a global recall for the EX30 model due to fire risks associated with CATL batteries, affecting vehicles produced between September 6, 2024, and October 25, 2025 [3]. - The recall includes 40 vehicles in the United States, 2,815 in Australia, and 10,440 in the UK, among others [3]. - A fire incident involving a Volvo EX30 occurred in Brazil, prompting the recall and safety warnings for owners to limit battery charging to 70% until a full recall plan is established [3][4]. Group 2: Customer Concerns - Chinese EX30 owners are expressing dissatisfaction over the lack of recall information in China, feeling neglected compared to international customers [4][6]. - Social media discussions among Volvo EX30 owners indicate a strong demand for official responses from the company regarding the perceived differential treatment [6][8]. Group 3: Sales and Pricing Pressure - Volvo is experiencing significant sales pressure in China, with a reported 4% decline in overall sales for 2025, totaling 149,549 units [10]. - The company has resorted to heavy discounts on multiple models, with some vehicles being offered at nearly 50% off their original prices, indicating a struggle to maintain market share [8][9]. - The decline in sales is attributed to a 46% drop in fully electric vehicle sales and a 13% decrease in fuel vehicle sales, despite a rise in hybrid model sales [10]. Group 4: Corporate Statements and Credibility - Volvo's senior executives have previously stated that the company would not compromise on safety and quality to gain market share, yet the current situation raises questions about the credibility of these claims [11][13]. - The ongoing battery safety issues and aggressive pricing strategies suggest a potential disconnect between corporate messaging and operational realities [14].