GDX vs. GLDM: Gold Miners With Leverage or Direct Gold Price Exposure

Core Insights - The VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and the SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) respond differently to gold prices, catering to distinct investment strategies [2][9] Cost and Size Comparison - GDX has an expense ratio of 0.51% and GLDM has a lower expense ratio of 0.10%, making GLDM more attractive for cost-conscious investors [3][4] - As of January 20, 2026, GDX has a one-year return of 181.64% compared to GLDM's 75.86% [3] - GDX has assets under management (AUM) of $25.8 billion, while GLDM has AUM of $25.29 billion [3] Performance and Risk Analysis - Over five years, GDX experienced a maximum drawdown of -46.52%, while GLDM had a maximum drawdown of -20.92% [5] - An investment of $1,000 in GDX would grow to $2,587 over five years, compared to $2,427 for GLDM [5] Portfolio Composition - GLDM is structured to reflect the price of physical gold, providing pure-play gold exposure without the volatility associated with mining companies [6] - GDX invests exclusively in gold mining companies, which introduces additional risks related to company performance and management [7] Investment Implications - GLDM is suitable for investors seeking direct exposure to gold prices with less volatility, while GDX offers potential for higher returns through mining company performance [10][12] - The performance of GDX can diverge from gold prices due to operational risks and market sentiment, making it more volatile [11]