Plaintiffs' Evidence Will Be Heard in Cases Alleging J&J's Talc Products Caused Women's Ovarian Cancer, Announced Levin Papantonio Attorney Chris Tisi

Core Opinion - A U.S. District Court Special Master has allowed plaintiffs to present expert testimony that talc use may cause ovarian cancer, emphasizing that these issues should be decided by juries rather than corporations [2][3][4] Legal Proceedings - Judge L. Wolfson's ruling aligns with similar decisions across the country, reinforcing the role of juries in evaluating scientific credibility [3] - The court has upheld the admissibility of expert testimony regarding the presence of trace asbestos in J&J's talc and the adequacy of historical testing methods [6][7] Implications for Johnson & Johnson - The ruling indicates that J&J cannot avoid court by challenging the credibility of scientific evidence [4] - J&J plans to appeal the recommendation, but predictions suggest that the appeal may be dismissed quickly, leading to a federal trial [8] Industry Context - The case highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding the safety of talc products and their alleged links to serious health issues, including ovarian cancer and mesothelioma [6] - The court's decision allows for discussions on marketing practices and corporate knowledge regarding talc and asbestos, which could impact J&J's defense strategy [7]