“特朗普2.0”一年关键词：关税、空袭、停摆交织下的乱局

Group 1: Economic Impact - The actual tariff levels in the U.S. reached the highest in nearly a century during Trump's second term, leading to increased uncertainty in global trade [1][2] - The U.S. soybean growers expressed concerns over escalating tariffs on China, hoping for a new trade agreement to protect their market [3] - Small retailers are forced to raise prices due to the burden of additional tariffs, which has not resulted in the expected economic restructuring [2][3] Group 2: Military Actions - Trump’s administration conducted military strikes in seven countries, with at least 626 airstrikes, significantly exceeding the data from Biden's four-year term [3][4] - The administration's military interventions are seen as contradictory to Trump's earlier claims of ending endless wars, impacting his political legacy negatively [3][4] Group 3: Public Sentiment - Trump's approval rating dropped from 47% to 36% within a year, marking the lowest first-year approval rating for any U.S. president since modern polling began [5] - A significant portion of the public views Trump's first year as a failure, with 58% expressing dissatisfaction with his presidency [5] - Trust in the federal government to make correct decisions has plummeted to 17%, the lowest since 1960 [5] Group 4: Protests and Civil Unrest - Over 33,000 protests and gatherings occurred in the U.S. since January 2025, nearly four times the number during Trump's first term [7][8] - The protests were largely in response to aggressive immigration policies and federal actions, indicating a rise in civil unrest [7][8] Group 5: Government Shutdown - The U.S. government experienced a historic 43-day shutdown due to budget negotiations, affecting around 1.4 million federal employees and leading to significant public discontent [9] - During the shutdown, approximately 42 million people faced food assistance challenges, highlighting the impact on low-income populations [9] Group 6: Future Projections - Analysts predict that Trump's administration will increasingly focus on aggressive foreign policy, moving away from previous diplomatic approaches [10] - The shift towards a more violent and unilateral approach to U.S. foreign policy is expected to continue, undermining the established global order [10]