婚纱照尺寸“缩水”是否构成欺诈?法院:非欺诈驳回三倍赔偿
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-22 11:57

Core Viewpoint - The case revolves around a dispute between a consumer and a photography studio regarding the size of wedding photos, leading to a court ruling that the studio did not commit fraud or breach the contract [4]. Group 1: Case Background - In December 2023, a consumer named Li purchased a wedding photography package for 4680 yuan, which included various products such as a 10-inch album and a happiness wall with nine 10-inch photos [2]. - In March 2024, Li received the products and found that the album and happiness wall photos were only 8 inches instead of the agreed 10 inches [2]. - After discussions, the studio agreed to remake the products with a specified size of 25.48 cm by 20.32 cm, but the new happiness wall photos were still not compliant, measuring 24 cm by 18 cm [2]. Group 2: Court Proceedings - The photography studio brought in a representative from the production factory to explain that the standard 10-inch size in the industry often involves trimming, which can lead to variations in actual dimensions [3]. - The court found that the service contract between Li and the studio was valid and that the studio did not have fraudulent intent, as the products were produced according to industry standards [4]. - The court ruled that there was no evidence of fraud or breach of contract by the studio, thus dismissing all of Li's claims for compensation [4]. Group 3: Legal Insights - The judge emphasized the importance of consumers clearly documenting key parameters such as size, material, and delivery standards in written agreements to protect their rights in case of disputes [5]. - Businesses are advised to maintain transparency about product specifications and production processes, ensuring that consumers are well-informed to avoid misunderstandings [5].

婚纱照尺寸“缩水”是否构成欺诈?法院:非欺诈驳回三倍赔偿 - Reportify