Group 1 - The scale of passive funds continues to rise while active funds decrease, with passive funds reaching 5.48 trillion and active funds dropping to 3.97 trillion [8][10] - The average position of various types of funds has decreased, with active equity funds averaging 87.8% [12] - The concentration of holdings in active equity funds has increased, with the top 20, 50, and 100 stocks accounting for 34.12%, 48.24%, and 60.73% respectively [14] Group 2 - Active equity funds are focusing on cyclical sectors, AI, and non-bank financials, with significant increases in positions in non-ferrous metals, chemicals, and oil & gas [3][36] - The active funds have increased their holdings in non-bank financials, particularly in the insurance sector, benefiting from the current interest rate environment [37] - The active funds have reduced their positions in TMT, healthcare, consumer services, and new energy sectors [21][27] Group 3 - Passive funds have seen a significant increase in holdings in communication, non-ferrous metals, and banks, while decreasing in electronics, power equipment, and biomedicine [44][45] - The proportion of holdings in the main board has increased for passive funds, while the shares in the ChiNext and STAR Market have decreased [40] - The relative over-allocation of passive funds compared to active funds has increased in sectors such as banking and media [45] Group 4 - The allocation of active funds to Hong Kong stocks has significantly decreased, with the total value of Hong Kong stocks held dropping from 19.26% to 16.23% of total holdings [48] - The number of Hong Kong stocks held by active funds has decreased from 376 to 361 [48] - The top holdings of active funds include Tencent, Alibaba, and SMIC, with notable changes in their respective share values [52]
招商策略:港股配比回落,重点增配顺周期及AI
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-22 13:55