不切实际要成绩，只会催生形式主义

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the prevalence of "data falsification" as a common problem in the context of reducing formalism and burdens on grassroots levels, driven by unrealistic targets and unreasonable directives from higher authorities [1] - There is a systemic issue where higher authorities impose unrealistic goals without considering the resources required for their achievement, leading to a culture of data manipulation at the grassroots level [1] - The emphasis on results over processes creates pressure on grassroots workers, resulting in a loss of motivation and creativity, ultimately distorting work objectives and increasing stress [1] Group 2 - To genuinely reduce burdens on grassroots levels, there is a need for leaders to engage deeply with the realities on the ground, transforming macro policies into actionable tasks that can be effectively implemented [2] - A shift in the evaluation system from focusing on "traces" to "actual performance" is necessary, along with the reduction of unnecessary documentation and meetings to allow grassroots workers to focus on real issues [2] - Empowering grassroots levels with more autonomy and fostering effective communication channels for feedback can help address the real pressures faced by these workers, promoting a more interactive and adaptive approach [2] Group 3 - The overall approach to reducing formalism must be systematic and grounded in reality, focusing on understanding the specific challenges faced by grassroots levels and breaking the chain of unreasonable pressure [3] - Establishing a scientific and humane assessment and incentive mechanism is crucial to allow grassroots workers to shift their focus from unnecessary paperwork to service and innovation [3] - The ultimate goal is to enable grassroots levels to detach from meaningless formalities and concentrate on achieving tangible results and effectiveness [3]