巴以代表均未到场，章程草案没提加沙冲突，特朗普在达沃斯启动“和平委员会”

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of the "Peace Committee" led by the United States aims to address the Gaza conflict and potentially expand its role in international conflict resolution, raising concerns about its implications for the United Nations [1][4][6]. Group 1: Formation and Purpose of the Peace Committee - On January 22, President Trump signed a document in Davos to officially launch the "Peace Committee," which he described as a long-prepared initiative aimed at demilitarizing Gaza and establishing a governance system [2][4]. - The committee is seen as a tool for the U.S. to manage international conflicts, with Trump suggesting that success in Gaza could lead to similar efforts in other regions [1][4]. Group 2: International Reactions and Participation - While 59 countries reportedly agreed to join the "Peace Committee," only 19 countries were represented at the signing event, with notable absences from Israeli and Palestinian representatives [4][5]. - Several European countries, including France and the Nordic nations, expressed concerns about the committee potentially undermining the UN's role, leading to their refusal to participate [4][5]. Group 3: Structure and Governance of the Committee - The committee's charter allows for a member to hold significant powers, including vetoing decisions and appointing successors, with Trump named as the inaugural chair [6][7]. - Membership terms are set for three years, with a provision for a "permanent seat" for contributions exceeding $10 billion, which has raised questions about the motivations behind participation [5][6]. Group 4: Implications for the United Nations - Experts suggest that the "Peace Committee" could challenge the UN's authority, as its mission overlaps with the UN's objectives of maintaining international peace and security [6][7]. - The committee's establishment reflects a growing distrust in the UN, with potential ramifications for global governance structures [6][7].