减负出实招 基层增效能（大家谈·持之以恒为基层减负①）

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news emphasizes the need to reduce unnecessary burdens on grassroots levels, allowing officials to focus more on practical work rather than excessive checks and assessments [1] - The reduction of meetings from five to two per month in a village setting illustrates the positive impact of this initiative, enabling officials to spend more time with the community and enhancing their motivation [2] - The cancellation of unnecessary assessments for grassroots judicial bodies aims to alleviate the pressure of data anxiety and improve the quality of case handling by allowing officials to concentrate on their core responsibilities [3] Group 2 - The establishment of a clear list of responsibilities for town and street-level governance is crucial for reducing burdens and clarifying roles, preventing the transfer of excessive responsibilities to grassroots levels [5] - The initiative to create a responsibility list is seen as a significant step towards addressing the issue of disproportionate responsibilities in grassroots governance, ensuring that officials only handle tasks they are equipped to manage [5] - The approach to compile the responsibility list should avoid formalistic requirements and focus on practical responsibilities, thereby empowering grassroots officials and preventing ambiguity in accountability [5]