Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-23 10:49Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the changing landscape of public fund heavyweights, with CATL maintaining its top position while Zhongji Xuchuang rapidly closes the gap [1][6] - As of the end of 2025, CATL holds a total market value of 181.83 billion yuan, while Zhongji Xuchuang has reached 162.14 billion yuan, significantly narrowing the gap from 96.01 billion yuan in the previous quarter [6][8] - The top ten heavyweights in public funds include CATL, Zhongji Xuchuang, Xinyi Semiconductor, Kweichow Moutai, Zijin Mining, Tencent Holdings, China Ping An, Cambricon Technologies, Alibaba-W, and China Merchants Bank, with total market values ranging from 57.91 billion yuan to 181.83 billion yuan [6][10] Group 2 - In the active fund category, Zhongji Xuchuang has overtaken CATL to become the top heavyweight, with a total market value of 82.54 billion yuan, while CATL's value is 69.18 billion yuan [3][10] - The active funds show a preference for technology and cyclical stocks, with significant increases in rankings for Xinyi Semiconductor and Zijin Mining, while Tencent Holdings and Alibaba-W have seen declines [3][12] - The top ten heavyweights in active funds include Zhongji Xuchuang, CATL, Xinyi Semiconductor, Tencent Holdings, Zijin Mining, Alibaba-W, Cambricon Technologies, Luxshare Precision, Kweichow Moutai, and Dongshan Precision, with market values ranging from 25.61 billion yuan to 82.54 billion yuan [10][11] Group 3 - The public fund's top ten increased holdings are dominated by "Chinese-character" stocks, focusing on the financial and energy sectors, with notable increases in Industrial Bank, China Cinda, and Industrial and Commercial Bank of China [4][15] - The financial sector saw significant increases in holdings, primarily driven by broad-based ETFs, while the energy sector also experienced collective increases from dividend ETFs [4][15] - The top ten stocks with the largest reductions in holdings are concentrated in the financial, media technology, and traditional cyclical sectors, with Oriental Fortune and Focus Media being the most significantly reduced [5][16] Group 4 - In the fourth quarter, Oriental Fortune and Focus Media were the only two stocks that saw reductions exceeding 60,000 shares, indicating a consensus among institutions to withdraw from these stocks [5][16] - The reduction in Oriental Fortune was primarily driven by multiple broad-based ETFs, while Focus Media faced significant reductions from several well-known active fund managers [5][16] - The reduction list also includes Agricultural Bank of China, Nanjing Steel, and China CITIC Bank, which were primarily affected by dividend-themed ETFs [17]