女子恋爱时向男友借款5万元，写下借条称若未归还就“以身相许”，分手后男子索要欠款遭拒，法院判了

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the agreement of "offering oneself in marriage" as a means to repay a debt is against public order and morals, thus invalidating that part of the loan agreement and requiring the borrower to repay the loan amount of 50,000 yuan [1][2]. Group 1: Case Summary - A woman borrowed 50,000 yuan from her boyfriend and wrote a note stating that if she did not repay, she would "offer herself in marriage" to him [1]. - After their relationship ended, the man sought repayment, but the woman insisted on fulfilling her promise of marriage instead of repaying the loan [1]. - The court found that the marriage relationship must be based on mutual consent and cannot be used as a means to fulfill a financial obligation [2]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The court determined that the clause regarding "offering oneself in marriage" was invalid due to its contradiction with public order and morals, thus the woman is obligated to repay the loan [2]. - The ruling emphasizes that legal protection is afforded to legitimate lending relationships, and agreements that involve personal relationships as a condition for repayment are void [2]. - In similar cases, courts focus on the delivery of funds, mutual consent for the loan, and the evidence of the debt when adjudicating such special private lending disputes [2].