Core Viewpoint - The article argues that Canada's diplomatic engagement with China is a strategic move for diversification rather than a short-sighted provocation against the U.S. [1][2] Group 1: Strategic Diversification - Canada's approach to deepen cooperation with China is a calculated strategy to mitigate risks associated with U.S. protectionism and unilateralism [2][4] - The shift towards China is not an emotional reaction to U.S. policies but a rational decision based on national interests [2][4] Group 2: Economic Benefits - Canada has reduced tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles to 6.1%, benefiting consumers and promoting green energy transition [3] - The reduction of tariffs on Canadian canola to 15% by China provides significant advantages to Canadian farmers, offering a buffer against market volatility [3] Group 3: Arctic Sovereignty and Cooperation - Discussions on Arctic sovereignty with China are framed as a necessary collaboration to address climate change and resource management, rather than a betrayal of NATO [4] - Canada’s willingness to engage with China in Arctic governance reflects a recognition that global challenges require inclusive dialogue rather than military alliances [4] Group 4: Changing Global Dynamics - The article highlights a shift away from a unipolar world dominated by a single superpower, emphasizing the need for middle powers like Canada to collaborate [5] - Canada's recent actions are portrayed as a bold step towards establishing itself as a resilient core in the global economy, rather than a subordinate to Washington [5]
美媒:加对华合作是务实,而非短视
Xin Lang Cai Jing·2026-01-23 22:58