驳斥外国政客干预黎智英案 香港法律界：无惧施压

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing legal proceedings against pro-democracy figure Jimmy Lai under Hong Kong's National Security Law, highlighting the resilience of Hong Kong's legal system against external pressures and interference [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Judicial Independence - The Hong Kong judiciary is described as having a solid foundation, unaffected by external political pressures, as stated by legal professionals [1]. - Chief Justice of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, Zhang Jueneng, criticized foreign politicians for attempting to interfere with judicial independence, labeling such actions as detrimental to justice [1]. - The Secretary for Justice, Paul Lam, dismissed the claims made by external forces as baseless accusations [1]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The core of Hong Kong's rule of law is judicial independence, as emphasized by Gu Minkang, Director of the National Security and Law Education Research Center at the Education University of Hong Kong [1]. - Any actions that challenge legal boundaries or endanger national security will face severe penalties, and attempts to interfere with the judiciary will not succeed [1]. - The court's handling of Jimmy Lai's case was noted to respect his legal rights, allowing him to hire lawyers, present evidence, and plead, thus upholding procedural justice [1]. Group 3: Public Perception and International Response - Legal experts suggest that the judiciary should continue to uphold its traditions and principles, providing clear explanations regarding the specifics of the Lai case to the public and the international community [2]. - Legislative Council member Chan Yong highlighted the courage of Hong Kong judges in the face of external pressures, attributing it to their commitment to legal principles [2]. - Chan emphasized that the integrity of Hong Kong's judicial system withstands scrutiny against defamatory claims regarding its rule of law [2].