WGMI vs. HODL: Same Crypto, Wildly Different Results

Core Insights - VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) provides direct exposure to Bitcoin, while CoinShares Bitcoin Mining ETF (WGMI) targets the broader Bitcoin mining ecosystem, highlighting differences in cost, risk profile, and diversification [2][3] Fund Comparison - HODL is a single-asset fund backed by Bitcoin, aiming to mirror its price, whereas WGMI holds a diversified portfolio of companies involved in Bitcoin mining and related services [3][6] - HODL has an expense ratio of 0.20% and $1.4 billion in assets under management (AUM), while WGMI has a higher expense ratio of 0.75% and $355.7 million in AUM [4][5] Performance Metrics - As of January 9, 2026, HODL has a 1-year return of -15.1%, while WGMI has significantly outperformed with a return of 84.0% [4][8] - WGMI has a beta of 6.01, indicating higher volatility compared to HODL, which does not have a beta value reported [4] Portfolio Composition - WGMI's portfolio consists of 81% in financials, 18% in technology, and 1% in utilities, with key holdings including IREN, Cipher Mining, and Hut 8 [6] - HODL exclusively holds Bitcoin, making it highly sensitive to Bitcoin's price movements, with no sector diversification [7] Investment Implications - Cryptocurrency ETFs like HODL and WGMI are relatively new and come with extreme volatility, necessitating careful consideration by investors [8] - WGMI's diversified portfolio may appeal to those seeking exposure to the Bitcoin mining sector, while HODL is suited for investors looking for direct Bitcoin investment [8]