International ETFs: Low-Cost SPDW vs. Values-Based NZAC

Core Insights - The article compares two global equity ETFs: SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (SPDW) and SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC), highlighting their differing investment strategies and target audiences [2][3] Cost and Size Comparison - NZAC has an expense ratio of 0.12% and a 1-year return of 15.4%, while SPDW has a lower expense ratio of 0.03% and a higher 1-year return of 31.3% [4] - SPDW also offers a higher dividend yield of 3.3% compared to NZAC's 1.9%, with SPDW's assets under management (AUM) at $33.4 billion versus NZAC's $180 million [4] Performance and Risk Analysis - Over a 5-year period, NZAC experienced a maximum drawdown of -28.29%, while SPDW had a slightly deeper drawdown of -30.20% [5] - The growth of a $1,000 investment over 5 years would yield $1,501 for NZAC and $1,321 for SPDW, indicating that NZAC has outperformed in terms of growth [5] Portfolio Composition - SPDW focuses on developed international equities outside the U.S., with major sectors including financial services (23%), industrials (19%), and technology (11%), featuring 2,390 holdings [6] - NZAC, on the other hand, emphasizes a climate-focused ESG mandate with a significant technology allocation of 35%, including major companies like Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft [7] Investment Implications - SPDW is positioned as a more cost-effective option with a higher yield and stronger recent returns, while NZAC appeals to investors prioritizing technology and ESG criteria [9] - Both ETFs provide access to international stocks but define "international" differently, with SPDW focusing on developed markets excluding the U.S. and NZAC including American tech giants while adhering to climate criteria [10]