观点：Crypto 必须确保这座大教堂不被赌场吞噬

Core Insights - The article discusses the importance of understanding not just who remains in the crypto industry, but why they stay and whether the ecosystem can support a revolution in the sector [2][16] - It highlights the contrasting paths taken by American and Chinese crypto OGs (original gangsters) after achieving financial success, with many in China opting to exit rather than contribute back to the ecosystem [7][8] Group 1: American Crypto OGs - American crypto OGs, after making significant profits, focus on building and supporting the ecosystem rather than exiting, as seen with figures like Brian Armstrong and Naval Ravikant [3][4] - They engage in initiatives that reshape the knowledge production system and promote compliance frameworks for token issuance, contributing to a sustainable ecosystem [3][4] - The emphasis is on attracting talent and creating meaningful applications, rather than merely participating in speculative activities [6][14] Group 2: Chinese Crypto OGs - Chinese crypto OGs face systemic challenges, including a lack of supportive policies and historical narratives that encourage long-term investment in the ecosystem [7][8] - Many choose to exit after achieving financial success, leading to a talent drain and a focus on short-term gains rather than long-term value creation [8][10] - The article argues that this trend results in a vicious cycle where the lack of new value creation reinforces a speculative mindset, further driving away innovators [10][11] Group 3: The Need for Ecosystem Support - The article stresses the necessity of a supportive ecosystem to foster innovation and attract talent, suggesting that small initiatives can lead to significant impacts over time [12][16] - It calls for a redefinition of success in the crypto space, emphasizing the importance of creating real value rather than engaging in zero-sum games [16][17] - The long-term sustainability of the crypto ecosystem depends on establishing mechanisms that encourage contributions back to the community, ensuring that the foundational "cathedral" is not overshadowed by speculative "casinos" [14][15][17]