从“零”开始 重塑治理效能

Core Insights - The essence of zero-based budgeting reform is a profound transformation in government governance, breaking away from traditional budgetary practices and reshaping distribution logic [1][4] - Zero-based budgeting aims to eliminate ineffective expenditures and reduce low-efficiency projects by requiring justification for every expenditure based on actual needs and financial conditions [1][3] Group 1: Budgetary Transformation - Zero-based budgeting starts from a "zero" point, detaching from historical baselines, which has led to a significant reduction in project numbers and a decrease in ineffective spending [1] - In Anhui Province, the reform resulted in the cancellation of 25 policies, reduction of 35, continuation of 40, integration of 43, and strengthening of 42, leading to a decrease in project numbers by 22% and a reduction of funds by 8.87 billion [1] Group 2: Governance Efficiency - The reform promotes a shift from fragmented governance to collaborative efficiency, breaking down administrative barriers and enabling departments to compete for resources based on strategic priorities and performance goals [2] - The establishment of cross-departmental teams and checklist management mechanisms enhances the government's collaborative governance capabilities, improving resource allocation efficiency [2] Group 3: Public Value Alignment - The fundamental pursuit of zero-based budgeting reform is to achieve a precise match between governance effectiveness and public value, focusing on key areas such as major strategies and public welfare [3] - In Jiangxi Province, the budget for 2025 will eliminate 142 expired projects, reallocating 730 million to critical areas, with public welfare expenditures constituting about 80% of the general public budget [3] Group 4: Systematic Challenges and Solutions - The reform faces challenges such as the need for a robust performance evaluation system, unified expenditure standards, and difficulties in departmental collaboration [4] - A systematic approach is required to address these challenges, including strengthening top-level design and gradually extending the reform from project expenditures to the entire budget [4]