从赛道博弈回归能力竞争 全链条规范推动基金行业提质增效

Core Viewpoint - The newly released guidelines and operational details for public fund performance benchmarks aim to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses existing industry pain points, promoting high-quality development in the public fund sector by shifting focus from scale-driven and short-term ranking practices to long-term value creation [1][5]. Group 1: Performance Benchmark Guidelines - The guidelines require that the selection and use of performance benchmarks prioritize the interests of fund shareholders and adhere to principles of representativeness, objectivity, continuity, and constraint [2]. - The guidelines emphasize that performance benchmarks should reflect the investment style of fund products and align with the fund's investment goals, strategies, and restrictions [2][3]. - The operational details mandate fund managers to establish mechanisms for selecting, disclosing, monitoring, evaluating, and correcting performance benchmarks, thereby enhancing the clarity and stability of investment styles and product positioning [2][4]. Group 2: Impact on Investment Behavior - The new regulations are expected to enhance the discipline of active investment by fund managers, leading to clearer and more stable investment styles, which will attract more long-term capital into the market [2][4]. - The guidelines link performance benchmarks to fund manager compensation, encouraging a focus on long-term returns and aligning the interests of fund managers with those of investors [4][5]. Group 3: Industry Competition and Evaluation - The guidelines aim to shift the industry competition from a focus on short-term market trends to a capability-driven approach, emphasizing sustainable excess returns through solid research [6]. - The guidelines require fund evaluation and award institutions to adopt a more scientific approach to fund performance assessment, using performance benchmarks as a key criterion for evaluating investment management [7][8]. - Fund sales institutions are mandated to display both fund performance and benchmark performance, facilitating better comparisons for investors [8]. Group 4: Ecosystem and Responsibilities - The guidelines establish a multi-dimensional supervision system covering product creation, investment operations, sales services, and performance evaluation, aiming to purify the industry ecosystem and enhance investor experience [8]. - Fund custodians are required to fulfill their supervisory responsibilities, including reviewing fund contracts and monitoring investment style stability [7][8].