失信名单人数为何连续两年下降？最高法回应

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has effectively addressed the issue of execution difficulties through cross-execution, with a notable decrease in the number of individuals on the dishonesty list in 2024 and 2025, indicating a positive trend in judicial enforcement [1][7]. Group 1: Execution and Dishonesty List - In 2025, 2.34 million individuals were newly added to the dishonesty list, while 2.67 million individuals were rehabilitated through credit restoration, marking a continuous seven-quarter trend where rehabilitation exceeded new additions [1][6]. - The cumulative number of individuals who voluntarily fulfilled their obligations due to the pressure of dishonesty penalties reached 18.65 million [1][6]. - The number of individuals on the dishonesty list has decreased for two consecutive years, suggesting effective implementation of the dishonesty list system as a key measure to resolve execution difficulties [7][8]. Group 2: Judicial Measures and Enforcement - The People's Court has implemented strict entry criteria for the dishonesty list, preventing misuse and ensuring that only those who can pay but refuse to do so are penalized, thus providing relief to honest but unfortunate debtors [2][8]. - In 2025, the volume of execution cases increased by 15.43%, while the number of new additions to the dishonesty list decreased by 117,000 individuals [2][8]. - The courts have established a positive feedback loop of "punishment-fulfillment-restoration," encouraging debtors who actively correct their dishonest behavior to restore their credit [2][8]. Group 3: Classification and Precision of Punishment - The People's Court has categorized dishonesty into three levels: minor, general, and serious, allowing for differentiated penalties based on the debtor's willingness and potential to repay [2][8]. - The decrease in the dishonesty list does not indicate a reduction in enforcement strength but rather an increase in the precision of punishment and effectiveness of execution [3][8]. - The courts maintain a firm stance against evasion of execution, ensuring that penalties for such behaviors will be intensified [3][8]. Group 4: Challenges and New Developments - The courts face ongoing challenges with debtors who have the means to repay but choose to evade, highlighting the persistent issues of evasion and resistance to execution [3][8]. - Recent years have seen a rise in the use of new asset forms and cross-border assets to evade execution, prompting the courts to enhance their asset discovery and control measures [5][10]. - The courts have made significant progress in joint punishment for dishonesty, achieving 36 new developments in this area [10].