壹快评｜惩戒科研不端，岂可让依托单位逍遥事外

Core Viewpoint - The governance of scientific misconduct must form a closed loop of "individual-institution-system" interaction, emphasizing the need for institutions to take responsibility in preventing such behaviors [1][2][3] Group 1: Current Situation - The National Natural Science Foundation of China reported 46 cases of scientific misconduct involving over 20 universities and hospitals, with only individual penalties disclosed, raising concerns about institutional accountability [1] - Institutions are seen as the primary platform for organizing research activities and managing researchers, thus their role in preventing misconduct is crucial [1] Group 2: Institutional Responsibilities - Institutions should implement strict internal review and educational responsibilities, establishing comprehensive management systems for research projects and ongoing integrity education [2] - Institutions must take proactive investigation and handling responsibilities, initiating independent investigations upon receiving leads or reports of misconduct [2] Group 3: Accountability and Supervision - Institutions should accept supervision and bear joint responsibility when misconduct is confirmed, especially if linked to management failures or negative cultural influences [3] - A cross-departmental joint punishment mechanism for scientific integrity should be established, linking severe misconduct to professional appointments and social credit systems [3] - The assessment of institutions should include their performance in research integrity, shifting focus from purely quantitative metrics to include qualitative aspects like academic ethics [3]