失信名单人数连续两年下降！最高法：衡量执行工作 要看多少真金白银装进胜诉当事人的口袋

Core Viewpoint - The focus of the judicial execution work is not merely on the number of names on the dishonesty list, but rather on the actual financial recovery for winning parties and the opportunities for debtors to restart their development, promoting a culture of trustworthiness and commitment [1] Group 1: Execution and Credit Repair - In 2025, 2.3398 million new entries were added to the dishonesty list, while 2.6696 million individuals were restored to creditworthiness, marking a continuous trend where credit repair instances have exceeded new entries for seven consecutive quarters [1] - The number of individuals on the dishonesty list decreased for the first time in 2024, indicating a positive change in the judicial execution landscape [1] - The courts have implemented a "punishment-repair" cycle, encouraging debtors who actively fulfill their obligations to receive positive incentives and facilitating their credit repair [2] Group 2: Classification and Strategy - The courts have differentiated between "refusal to perform" and "inability to perform," applying targeted measures to reduce dishonesty from the source [2] - The execution case volume increased by 15.43% year-on-year in 2025, while the number of new entries to the dishonesty list decreased by 117,000 individuals [2] - A classification system for dishonesty has been established, categorizing behaviors into minor, general, and severe levels, allowing for a more nuanced approach to enforcement [2] Group 3: Judicial Attitude and Execution Effectiveness - The judicial attitude emphasizes a balance between strict enforcement and support for those facing temporary difficulties, promoting a culture of voluntary compliance [4] - The decrease in the number of individuals on the dishonesty list reflects an increase in the precision of punishments and the effectiveness of execution, rather than a reduction in enforcement [3] - The courts maintain a firm stance against evasion of execution, ensuring that the most severe penalties are focused on serious offenders [3]