意见征求要“真求”！

Group 1 - The core issue identified is that many departments are conducting opinion solicitation activities that are superficial and do not genuinely seek public input, leading to a lack of effective decision-making [1][2] - Various methods of insincere solicitation are highlighted, including filtering opinions from only selected individuals, ignoring submitted feedback, and rushing the process without proper consideration [1] - This superficial approach undermines public trust and the credibility of grassroots governance, primarily driven by bureaucratic and formalistic tendencies within certain departments [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of insincere opinion solicitation, it is essential to focus on genuine engagement by strengthening institutional rigidity and making public satisfaction a key standard [2] - The collection, adoption, and implementation of opinions should be included in government transparency efforts to enhance public participation and compel solicitors to improve their work quality [2] - Increased oversight and strict penalties for departments treating opinion solicitation as a mere formality are necessary to ensure accountability and effectiveness in governance [2]