Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that innovation is the primary driving force for development, while security is the prerequisite and bottom line for innovative development. A controlled and traceable open scenario is necessary to address security bottlenecks in emerging fields [1][2][3] - New types of security risks include inherent technical risks such as AI model algorithm defects and unreliable output decisions, as well as physical security incidents from attacks on new energy systems and cross-domain security challenges from 6G applications. These risks exceed traditional network and data security protections [1][2] - The rapid iteration of new technologies and business models, coupled with insufficient investment in security research and delayed protective technology development, creates a dilemma for security companies, making it difficult to form targeted solutions due to high replication costs and complex scenarios [1][2] Group 2 - The national and municipal levels in Beijing are placing significant emphasis on the innovation and safety standards of emerging fields, establishing a comprehensive support system through strategic planning, special policies, and legal regulations [2] - Recommendations include creating a "limited, controllable, and traceable" open scenario management system, which involves clarifying responsibilities and processes, establishing online platforms for resource coordination, and incentivizing companies with policy support [2][3] - As a leading company in the cybersecurity industry, Tianrongxin has accumulated solid practical results in areas such as large model security and energy security, advocating for a balance between safety and innovation through institutional innovation [3]
未来产业及战略产业快速发展,李雪莹建议完善相关行业人才培养政策
Jin Rong Jie·2026-01-27 07:56