Core Viewpoint - The release of the "Guidelines for Performance Benchmarking of Publicly Raised Securities Investment Funds" and the "Operational Rules for Performance Benchmarking" marks a new phase of systematic and standardized benchmark management in China's public fund industry, aimed at addressing issues like "style drift" and benchmark abuse, while enhancing product transparency and investment discipline [1][3]. Group 1: Guidelines and Operational Rules - The guidelines will take effect on March 1, 2026, and are designed to prevent "style drift" in public funds by establishing a comprehensive internal control mechanism for fund companies and unified requirements for collaborative supervision among third-party institutions [1][2]. - The guidelines consist of six chapters and 21 articles, covering aspects such as the selection, change, and disclosure of performance benchmarks, as well as internal controls and external constraints [4]. Group 2: Role of Performance Benchmark - Performance benchmarks serve as a "anchor" and "ruler" for fund investments, clarifying product positioning, investment strategies, and measuring performance [2][3]. - The guidelines emphasize the serious and stable application of performance benchmarks, requiring that they reflect product positioning and investment style, and that fund managers appoint experienced fund managers based on these benchmarks [4][5]. Group 3: Investor Protection and Experience - The guidelines and operational rules focus on investor interests, addressing long-standing issues like "style drift" and "fund blind boxes," thereby enhancing the investment experience and satisfaction for investors [3][4]. - By strengthening the constraints on investment behavior through improved internal control mechanisms, the guidelines aim to promote clearer and more stable investment styles and product positioning [5]. Group 4: Link to Compensation and Performance Assessment - The guidelines link performance benchmarks to fund manager compensation, encouraging a focus on long-term returns and aligning the interests of fund managers with those of investors [6]. - Regulatory bodies will further standardize fund evaluation mechanisms, requiring that performance benchmarks be used as a key basis for assessing fund management performance, risk control capabilities, and style stability [6].
系统规范公募基金业绩比较基准管理
Jin Rong Shi Bao·2026-01-28 00:46