How Does This Eco-Friendly ETF Match Up Against This International Fund?

Core Insights - The comparison highlights the differences between the SPDR MSCI ACWI Climate Paris Aligned ETF (NZAC) and the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), focusing on cost, risk, and sector exposure for investors [1] Cost & Size - NZAC has a lower expense ratio of 0.12% compared to EEM's 0.72% - As of January 25, 2026, NZAC reported a 1-year return of 16%, while EEM had a significantly higher return of 38.76% - Dividend yield for NZAC is 1.9%, slightly lower than EEM's 2.06% - NZAC has a beta of 1.54, indicating higher volatility compared to EEM's beta of 0.63 - Assets Under Management (AUM) for NZAC is $181.27 million, while EEM has a much larger AUM of $25.1 billion [2][3] Performance & Risk Comparison - Over the past five years, NZAC experienced a maximum drawdown of 28.29%, which is less severe than EEM's 39.82% - An investment of $1,000 in NZAC would have grown to $1,466 over five years, compared to $1,050 for EEM [4] Holdings Overview - EEM focuses on emerging markets with 1,241 stocks, heavily weighted towards the tech sector, including major positions in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing, ASML Holding, and Samsung [5] - NZAC targets companies that meet climate-aligned criteria, holding 729 stocks, primarily in the technology sector, with top positions in Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft [6] Investor Implications - A significant difference between the two ETFs is their international exposure; NZAC's top holdings are predominantly U.S. companies, while EEM's top 10 holdings are all non-U.S. stocks, which may introduce more volatility [7][9] - NZAC restricts its holdings to eco-friendly companies, while EEM offers broader diversification in emerging markets with a slightly higher dividend yield [8]