特朗普反对亲伊朗总理候选人，伊拉克：你和泽连斯基不也互怼过？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the U.S. government's strong opposition to the nomination of Nouri al-Maliki as Iraq's new Prime Minister, highlighting the geopolitical implications of this decision and the tensions between U.S. and Iranian influences in Iraq [1][2][4]. Group 1: U.S. Government's Position - The U.S. government expressed strong resistance to Maliki's candidacy, labeling his past governance as "extremely negative" and indicating that it would make sovereign judgments based on its interests [1][2]. - President Trump publicly warned Iraq that if Maliki were to take office, the U.S. would "no longer provide any assistance," criticizing Maliki's policies as "crazy" [2][4]. - The U.S. aims to see an Iraqi government that can "weaken Iran-supported terrorism" and dismantle militia groups, emphasizing that only such a government would be a viable partner for cooperation [1][4]. Group 2: Maliki's Background and Political Dynamics - Maliki, who has served as Prime Minister twice, has deep ties to Iranian Shiite factions and was previously pressured to resign by the U.S. [4][6]. - The nomination of Maliki has raised concerns among U.S. officials, who view him as a key representative of Iranian influence in Iraq [4][6]. - The leadership of the Shiite coalition, which nominated Maliki, includes figures associated with groups previously designated as terrorist organizations by the U.S., further complicating the political landscape [6]. Group 3: Internal Iraqi Reactions and Consequences - Maliki publicly condemned U.S. interference in Iraq's internal affairs and vowed to fight against it, despite facing significant challenges [6][7]. - The deployment of the USS Lincoln strike group to the region and potential financial measures by the U.S. could severely impact Iraq's economy, which relies on U.S. oversight of its oil revenues [6][7]. - Analysts suggest that the struggle over Maliki's nomination reflects deeper contradictions in Iraq's sovereignty and its reliance on external powers, with significant implications for the balance of power in the region [7][9].